Resource depletion contributes to, but does not cause, the attentional blink
نویسندگان
چکیده
Contemporary debates concerning the attentional blink (AB) question whether resource depletion causes this robust attentional deficit. To investigate this uncertainty, we employed rapid serial visual presentation paradigms that presented stimuli at 30-120msec/item. In addition to the two targets of interest, a third target was positioned immediately before the second target on ’three-target’ trials. ’Two-target’ trials, which were less resource intensive that the three-target trials, were also included. Interestingly, target accuracy was significantly improved on the threetarget trials compared with the two-target trials. Consequently, resource depletion cannot explain the AB because the deficit was alleviated when target detection resources were strained. However, we employed novel conditional accuracy analyses to show that, on three-target trials, the second target was better detected when the additional third target was not detected. Therefore, although resource depletion cannot explain the AB deficit on a global level, resources play an important role on the local level.
منابع مشابه
An attentional blink for sequentially presented targets: evidence in favor of resource depletion accounts.
Several accounts of the attentional blink (AB) have postulated that this dual-target deficit occurs because of limited-capacity attentional resources being devoted to processing the first target at the expense of the second (resource depletion accounts; e.g., Chun & Potter, 1995). Recent accounts have challenged this model (e.g., Di Lollo, Kawahara, Ghorashi, & Enns, 2005; Olivers, van der Stig...
متن کاملThe attentional blink is not a unitary phenomenon.
Identification of the second of two targets is impaired if it is presented less than about 500 ms after the first. Three models of this second-target deficit, known as attentional blink (AB), were compared: resource-depletion, bottleneck, and temporary loss of control (TLC). Five experiments, in which three sequential targets were inserted in a stream of distractors, showed that identification ...
متن کاملBoth exogenous and endogenous target salience manipulations support resource depletion accounts of the attentional blink: A reply to Olivers et al.
Input-control theories of the attentional blink (AB) suggest that this deficit results from impaired attentional selection caused by the post-Target 1 (T1) distractor (Di Lollo et al., 2005; Olivers et al., 2007). Accordingly, there should be no AB when there are no intervening distractors between the targets. Contrary to these hypotheses, Dux et al. (2008) observed an AB (T3 deficit) when thre...
متن کاملThe sparing is far from spurious: reevaluating within-trial contingency effects in the attentional blink.
The attentional blink is the marked deficit in awareness of a 2nd target (T2) when it is presented shortly after the 1st target (T1) in a stream of distractors. When the distractors between T1 and T2 are replaced by even more targets, the attentional blink is reduced or absent, indicating that the attentional blink results from online selection mechanisms that act in response to distracting inp...
متن کاملAn individual differences approach to multiple-target visual search errors: How search errors relate to different characteristics of attention.
A persistent problem in visual search is that searchers are more likely to miss a target if they have already found another in the same display. This phenomenon, the Subsequent Search Miss (SSM) effect, has remained despite being a known issue for decades. Increasingly, evidence supports a resource depletion account of SSM errors-a previously detected target consumes attentional resources leavi...
متن کامل